Non­fic­tion

Eman­ci­pa­tion: How Lib­er­at­ing Europe’s Jews from the Ghet­to Led to Rev­o­lu­tion and Renaissance

Michael Gold­farb
  • Review
By – October 28, 2011

Jour­nal­ist Michael Gold­farb, who is Senior Cor­re­spon­dent of Inside Out, the award-win­ning pub­lic radio doc­u­men­tary pro­gram, has writ­ten a his­to­ry chron­i­cling the response of the Jew­ish com­mu­ni­ty to its eman­ci­pa­tion on the eve of the French Rev­o­lu­tion in 1789. Many schol­ar­ly tomes have dealt with this sub­ject, but few writ­ten for the gen­er­al pub­lic have the clar­i­ty, insight, and com­mand of the sub­ject mat­ter as this work of history. 

Gold­farb attrib­ut­es the ideas lead­ing to Jew­ish eman­ci­pa­tion to the philo­soph­i­cal works of Spin­oza. He then exam­ines the man­ner in which sup­port­ers and oppo­nents of eman­ci­pa­tion pre­sent­ed their argu­ments, a debate that would con­tin­ue to res­onate among oppo­nents of eman­ci­pa­tion well into the begin­ning of the 20th cen­tu­ry. Along the way, Gold­farb pro­vides vignettes of many of the Jew­ish intel­lec­tu­als who not only ben­e­fit­ted from eman­ci­pa­tion but also helped shape mod­ern intel­lec­tu­al thought. Although read­ers will be famil­iar with such promi­nent Jews as Hen­rich Heine, Lud­wig Bourne, Karl Marx, Moses Hess, among the many assim­i­lat­ed or bap­tized Jews dis­cussed in the vol­ume, Gold­farb also intro­duces less­er known pio­neers of eman­ci­pa­tion, such as Zalkind Hour­witz. If Hourwitz’s name does not res­onate with the read­er, all the more rea­son to peruse Goldfarb’s work and intro­duce one­self to a neglect­ed fig­ure in mod­ern Jew­ish history. 

In his riv­et­ing account of Jew­ish eman­ci­pa­tion and its con­se­quences for the Jews of Europe, the author states that in writ­ing this book, he sought to answer two sim­ple ques­tions: Why was there this enor­mous explo­sion of Jew­ish achieve­ment, par­tic­u­lar­ly in the areas of cul­ture and intel­lec­tu­al life? And, what price? What was the price paid by the Jew­ish com­mu­ni­ty and Euro­pean soci­ety for the process of inte­grat­ing?” Gold­farb dis­cov­ers that eman­ci­pa­tion result­ed in a mixed response, most­ly a neg­a­tive one. In com­par­ing the key dif­fer­ences between eman­ci­pa­tion in France and Ger­many, Gold­farb writes that in France, Jews were encour­aged by law to think of them­selves as French­men, where­as in Ger­many, Jews were nev­er allowed to think of them­selves as any­thing oth­er than Jews, even after gain­ing civ­il rights. This was a les­son cer­tain­ly learned by Jews such as Heine and Gus­tave Mahler who found, once they con­vert­ed to Chris­tian­i­ty, that it made no dif­fer­ence — the response of many non-Jews was once a Jew, always a Jew.”

Jack Fis­chel is pro­fes­sor emer­i­tus of his­to­ry at Millersville Uni­ver­si­ty, Millersville, PA and author of The Holo­caust (Green­wood Press) and His­tor­i­cal Dic­tio­nary of the Holo­caust (Row­man and Littlefield).

Discussion Questions