Non­fic­tion

The Can­di­date: What It Takes To Win — And Hold — The White House

Samuel Pop­kin
  • From the Publisher
April 27, 2012
There are two win­ners in every pres­i­den­tial elec­tion cam­paign: The inevitable win­ner when it begins — such as Rudy Guliani or Hillary Clin­ton in 2008 — and the inevitable vic­tor after it ends. In The Can­di­date, Samuel Pop­kin explains the dif­fer­ence between them.

Based on detailed analy­ses of the win­ners — and losers — of the last 60 years of pres­i­den­tial cam­paigns, Pop­kin explains how chal­lengers get to the White House, how incum­bents stay there for a sec­ond term, and how suc­ces­sors hold pow­er for their par­ty. He looks in par­tic­u­lar at three cam­paigns — George H.W. Bush’s mud­dled cam­paign for reelec­tion in 1992, Al Gore’s flawed cam­paign for the pres­i­den­cy in 2000, and Hillary Clin­ton’s mis­man­aged effort to win the nom­i­na­tion in 2008 — and uncov­ers the lessons that Ronald Rea­gan can teach future can­di­dates about team­work. Through­out, Pop­kin illu­mi­nates the intri­ca­cies of pres­i­den­tial cam­paigns — the small details and the big pic­ture, the sur­pris­ing mis­takes and the pre­dictable mis­cues — in a riv­et­ing account of what goes on inside a cam­paign and what makes one suc­ceed while anoth­er fails.

A vision for the future and the audac­i­ty to run are only the first steps in a can­di­date’s run for office. Pres­i­den­tial hope­fuls can sur­vive the most gru­el­ing show on earth only if they under­stand the crit­i­cal fac­tors that Pop­kin reveals in The Can­di­date.



Discussion Questions