Non­fic­tion

Embrac­ing Exile: The Case for Jew­ish Diaspora

  • Review
June 20, 2024

Jew­ish peo­ple have always wan­dered. Accord­ing to their ori­gin sto­ry, they wan­dered from Ur of Chaldees to Canaan, then Egypt, and then back to Canaan. From there, they were exiled to Baby­lon, where they lived for cen­turies. They also set­tled in Per­sia, Egypt, Moroc­co, Spain, Italy, Turkey, Poland, Ukraine, Eng­land, the Unit­ed States, among many oth­er places. Dias­po­ra became nor­mal to Jews, and though they may have hoped for a return to their Promised Land” at the End of Days,” they made sense of their many homes, defend­ing dias­po­ra as the realm where Jew­ish life could grow, and they could ful­fil their oblig­a­tions to God.

Embrac­ing Exile ana­lyzes bib­li­cal and rab­binic texts, philo­soph­i­cal trea­tis­es, stud­ies of Kab­bal­ah, Hasidism, and a mul­ti­plic­i­ty of mod­ern expres­sions. It offers revised read­ings of the Bible’s book of Esther, a sur­vey of Tal­mu­dic treat­ments of exile, an in-depth analy­sis of the thought of the ear­ly mod­ern mas­ter, the Mahar­al of Prague, as well as the work of nov­el­ist Philip Roth, among oth­er mod­ern authors. David Krae­mer shows that Dias­po­ra Jews through the ages insist­ed that God joined them in their exiles, that Zion” was found in Baby­lon and East­ern Europe, and that, as cit­i­zens of the world, Jews could only live through­out the world. The result is a con­vinc­ing asser­tion that lament has not been the most com­mon Jew­ish response to dias­po­ra and that Zion­ism is not the nat­ur­al out­come of either Jew­ish ide­ol­o­gy or his­to­ry. Krae­mer also argues that as the world’s most expe­ri­enced sur­viv­ing refugees, Jews also offer a mod­el to more con­tem­po­rary refugees, demon­strat­ing how they may not only sur­vive but thrive and endure.

Discussion Questions