Non­fic­tion

The Dev­il’s Cas­tle: Nazi Eugen­ics, Euthana­sia, and How Psy­chi­a­try’s Trou­bled His­to­ry Rever­ber­ates Today

  • Review
By – September 15, 2025

In a deft blend of mem­oir and his­tor­i­cal account, Susan Pao­la Antonetta’s The Devil’s Cas­tle: Nazi Eugen­ics, Euthana­sia, and How Psychiatry’s Trou­bled His­to­ry describes the ways in which eugeni­cists in both the US and Ger­many influ­enced and, in part, cre­at­ed the found­ing beliefs of psy­chi­a­try, and how these beliefs embold­ened the Nazi regime to enact a eugenic agen­da through­out World War II, where­in the Nazis killed tens of thou­sands of Ger­mans and Jews that they deemed fee­ble-mind­ed” or with­out the will to live.”. Start­ing from the 1800s, the book push­es through to the present day, where Antonet­ta describes her life­time of expe­ri­enc­ing” (a less stig­ma­tiz­ing term she uses in lieu of the word psy­chosis) and how it was dis­mis­sive­ly and dep­re­cat­ing­ly treat­ed by the psy­chi­a­trists who were meant to help her.

To no sur­prise, The Devil’s Cas­tle is a dispir­it­ing book. Learn­ing about the Nazi’s eugenic beliefs and prac­tices was not sur­pris­ing, but the detail which Antonet­ta goes into about how lit­tle regard they had for the lives of the neu­ro­di­ver­gent makes it at times chal­leng­ing to get through. Thank­ful­ly, Anotonet­ta inter­spers­es the more ago­niz­ing pas­sages of her book with the sto­ries of two expe­ri­encers” who became impor­tant fig­ures in reimag­in­ing the treat­ment of the neu­ro­di­ver­gent: Paul Schre­ber and Dorothea Buck. Both were writ­ers who spent long peri­ods in Ger­man psy­chi­atric insti­tu­tions before and after the war, their rights revoked as they were treat­ed cru­el­ly and with­out dig­ni­ty, and their writ­ings on both their treat­ment in these insti­tu­tions and their expe­ri­ences” them­selves are explored to their fullest in The Devil’s Cas­tle, demon­strat­ing how their expe­ri­ences” offered insight into the nature of life that the neu­rotyp­i­cal don’t nec­es­sar­i­ly have access to.

Antonetta’s detail­ing the lega­cy of Emil Krae­pelin, a Ger­man psy­chi­a­trist and sup­posed father of psy­chi­a­try,” who was a eugeni­cist, chal­lenges the valid­i­ty of the biol­o­gy-based approach psy­chi­a­try cur­rent­ly has. Krae­pelin, feel­ing lit­tle empa­thy for those he treat­ed, saw men­tal health issues as stem­ming sole­ly from bio­log­i­cal fac­tors, which meant that they could only be treat­ed by bio­log­i­cal cures, like med­ica­tion or surg­eries, rather than oth­er options, like talk ther­a­py or hav­ing their expe­ri­ences” be giv­en greater con­sid­er­a­tion. Antonet­ta marks the path from Krae­pelin to cur­rent phar­ma­co­log­i­cal treat­ment of men­tal health issues and how the Krae­pelin­ian mode of treat­ment has in part result­ed in a sys­tem where psy­chi­a­trists meet with patients for twen­ty min­utes, doc­u­ment­ing symp­toms but learn­ing lit­tle of their patients’ lives, before prescribing.

The Devil’s Cas­tle is a sober­ing and dis­heart­en­ing — yet impor­tant — text. It shines a light onto a neglect­ed his­to­ry of World War II and onto a pop­u­la­tion that, too, has been neglect­ed and mistreated.

Ben­jamin Selesnick is a psy­chother­a­pist in New Jer­sey. His writ­ing has appeared in Bare­ly South ReviewLunch Tick­etTel Aviv Review of Books, and oth­er pub­li­ca­tions. He holds an MFA in fic­tion from Rut­gers University-Newark.

Discussion Questions