Non­fic­tion

Read­ing Her­zl in Beirut: The PLO Effort to Know the Enemy

By – July 24, 2025

Intrigu­ing­ly titled, Read­ing Her­zl in Beirut is a schol­ar­ly study of an enemy’s efforts to know its ene­my. Specif­i­cal­ly, Jonathan Marc Gri­betz, asso­ciate pro­fes­sor of Near East­ern Stud­ies at Prince­ton, doc­u­ments and ana­lyzes research under­tak­en by mem­bers of the Pales­tine Lib­er­a­tion Orga­ni­za­tion pri­or to 1982 to under­stand its ene­my — Israel. 

More than an intel­lec­tu­al exer­cise, the research, and the pub­li­ca­tions that result­ed, were part of the PLO’s intent to fight, dele­git­imize, and ulti­mate­ly destroy Israel. While the pub­li­ca­tions were not pro­pa­gan­dis­tic in nature, through them the pen joined the sword,” as the author puts it, link­ing schol­ar­ship and pol­i­tics in the war the Pales­tini­ans were wag­ing against Israel. The center’s research, analy­sis, and inter­pre­ta­tions also con­tributed to Pales­tin­ian self-definition.

All this work took place over a rel­a­tive­ly short peri­od of time. The PLO Research Cen­ter opened in Beirut in 1965, short­ly after the found­ing of the PLO itself, and in 1966 alone pub­lished nine­teen books. The cen­ter func­tioned for the next eigh­teen years, but was most pro­duc­tive in its first decade, pri­or to Lebanon’s civ­il war.

Gri­betz con­cludes his study by ask­ing the ques­tion that under­lies his own research: does know­ing the ene­my make a dif­fer­ence? Or to put it anoth­er way, does it have a mod­er­at­ing influ­ence? While Gri­betz finds some pos­i­tive indi­ca­tions, these are ques­tions that defy one-word answers. What is evi­dent to him, how­ev­er, is that at the PLO Research Cen­ter, pol­i­tics guid­ed knowl­edge pro­duc­tion.” At the same time, the cen­ter served as a space for inter­nal Pales­tin­ian polit­i­cal debate, and for hash­ing out new direc­tions in Pales­tin­ian nation­al­ist politics.”

How Gri­betz came to research the PLO Research Cen­ter is a sto­ry in itself. By chance he came across a trans­la­tion into Ara­bic of Arthur Hertzberg’s book The Zion­ist Idea, a sem­i­nal work pub­lished in 1959 describ­ing ear­ly Zion­ist thinkers of the nine­teenth and ear­ly twen­ti­eth cen­turies. The Ara­bic trans­la­tion was pub­lished by the PLO Research Cen­ter. It was the first Gri­betz heard of the cen­ter, and it sparked his curios­i­ty. This book is the result of that serendip­i­tous encounter.

Read­ing Her­zl in Beirut offers insights into how the center’s researchers inter­pret­ed Judaism, Zion­ism and Israel. It presents his­tor­i­cal con­text and, through inter­views with some of the researchers, describes the center’s main play­ers. Rich with detail, it is a com­pli­cat­ed sto­ry that will be of spe­cial val­ue to schol­ars of the region and of the Israeli – Pales­tin­ian con­flict, and for those wish­ing to study the his­to­ry and work of the PLO Research Center.

Gila Wertheimer is Asso­ciate Edi­tor of the Chica­go Jew­ish Star. She is an award-win­ning jour­nal­ist who has been review­ing books for 35 years.

Discussion Questions

Read­ing Her­zl in Beirut reveals a cru­cial miss­ing part in the his­to­ry of the Israel-Pales­tine con­flict. The book explores the fas­ci­nat­ing activ­i­ties of the PLO research cen­ter in Beirut and the stud­ies pro­duced there. It demon­strates, for the first time, the lev­el of curios­i­ty of the PLO towards Israel and how the PLO tried to under­stand their pri­ma­ry foe. Read­ing Her­zl in Beirut shows the depth of knowl­edge and research of Israeli soci­ety, cul­ture, his­to­ry, inter­nal pol­i­tics, and reli­gion. The book illu­mi­nates the com­po­nents of the research cen­ter analy­sis and their respons­es to cur­rent events.

In this incred­i­bly rich account, Jonathan Gri­betz metic­u­lous­ly reads the research prod­ucts out of Beirut but also places them in the con­text in which they were writ­ten: as a con­tin­u­ous attempt to eval­u­ate the intel­lec­tu­al strength of Israel and Zion­ism, appraise its abil­i­ty to har­ness mil­i­tary pow­er, and assess the neces­si­ty of vio­lence in a strug­gle for nation­al liberation.