Non­fic­tion

1873: The Roth­schilds, the First Great Depres­sion, and the Mak­ing of the Mod­ern World

  • Review
By – May 25, 2026

Liaquat Ahamed’s Pulitzer Prize-win­ning Lords of Finance explained the roles of key cen­tral bankers and the gold stan­dard in caus­ing the Great Depres­sion. In his new book, 1873, he takes read­ers to the late nine­teenth cen­tu­ry, when the bankers of Britain, France, Ger­many, and the Unit­ed States were in charge, bankrolling each other’s projects and rolling the dice on Turk­ish, Egypt­ian, and oth­er devel­op­ing coun­tries’ debts. Once again, gold plays a lead­ing role, this time as sil­ver is on its way out.

While Ahamed explains the details quite well as he goes along, it helps to start with a gen­er­al under­stand­ing of why finance mat­tered. In the late nine­teenth cen­tu­ry, most advanced economies were indus­tri­al­iz­ing, but lacked the infra­struc­ture to bring goods to mar­ket. To build the need­ed rail­roads and canals, busi­ness­men (or gov­ern­ments) raised funds in the cred­it mar­kets, so the actu­al cost of bor­row­ing mon­ey was impor­tant. The cost of bor­row­ing was a func­tion of a project’s risk­i­ness and the actu­al avail­abil­i­ty of mon­ey, lim­it­ed ini­tial­ly by avail­able stocks of gold and sil­ver, then by gold alone. The thru-line of Ahamed’s account is that in a peri­od with few new gold dis­cov­er­ies, drop­ping sil­ver as a back­ing for mon­ey pro­duced decades of dis­as­trous defla­tion in these major west­ern economies.

Ahamed under­stands the role of humor and anec­dote, pep­per­ing his account with the lead­ing char­ac­ters’ nick­names and foibles. We’re intro­duced to Eve­lyn Over-Bar­ing” (Britain’s Major Bar­ing) and Abdul the Damned” (Abdül­hamid II) and The Ohio Ici­cle” (US Sen­a­tor Sher­man). We learn that Ismail Pasha’s left-behind harem women riot­ed in 1879 and caused $40,000 in dam­ages. While these sto­ries keep us engaged, it’s the moments when we see that his­to­ry has repeat­ed itself that are real­ly com­pelling. Ahamed shares the sto­ry of US Sec­re­tary of State Blaine threat­en­ing Cana­da with the out­ra­geous­ly high 1890 tar­iffs if Cana­da didn’t agree to being annexed as our forty-fifth state. (Then, as now, Cana­da passed and made bet­ter deals else­where.) And while the late-nine­teenth-cen­tu­ry strug­gle over bimet­allism may seem arcane — we’ve all aban­doned the gold stan­dard as well as sil­ver, long ago — the advent of cryp­tocur­ren­cies (which Ahamed might be sav­ing for a next vol­ume?) is cur­rent­ly caus­ing much rethink­ing of mon­e­tary strategies.

One of the biggest areas where Ahamed’s his­to­ry repeats itself is less arcane: anti­semitism. While the Roth­schilds’ banks were sub­stan­tial play­ers in this peri­od, they were delib­er­ate­ly con­ser­v­a­tive in their loans and large­ly hid­den from pub­lic view. But time and again, when mar­kets crashed, when economies col­lapsed, there were always peo­ple mak­ing their fame or for­tune by accus­ing the Jews.

Ahamed’s 1873 might be a bit of work for the lay read­er, but returns on the time invest­ed are sol­id — even if you just remem­ber that Abdül­hamid II not only kept a food-taster, but also had a cig­a­rette-taster for that first puff! 

Bet­ti­na Berch, author of the recent biog­ra­phy, From Hes­ter Street to Hol­ly­wood: The Life and Work of Anzia Yezier­s­ka, teach­es part-time at the Bor­ough of Man­hat­tan Com­mu­ni­ty College.

Discussion Questions