Non­fic­tion

Anti­semitisms: A His­to­ry of Jew Hating

  • Review
By – July 6, 2026

For gen­er­a­tions of schol­ars, Sander Gilman’s thought-pro­vok­ing works are essen­tial resources. Indeed, the aca­d­e­m­ic field of Jew­ish Stud­ies itself would be unimag­in­able today with­out his inter­dis­ci­pli­nary body of work. Now, in Anti­semitisms: A His­to­ry of Jew Hat­ing, read­ers may glean from what he regards as the cul­mi­nat­ing refine­ment of his life­long engage­ment with the phe­nom­e­non. Amidst our grow­ing anx­i­ety and bewil­der­ment that this is prov­ing to be the most inaus­pi­cious time for Jews glob­al­ly since the Holo­caust, it is a book we sore­ly need.

Gilman moves us deft­ly from cen­tu­ry to cen­tu­ry across a range of cul­tures, and up to the after­math of Octo­ber 7th, 2023. Anti­semitisms is orga­nized around four case stud­ies that he sees as essen­tial to the con­struc­tion of the imag­ined Jew: vis­i­ble dif­fer­ence (appear­ance), vul­ner­a­bil­i­ty (dis­ease), belong­ing (root­ed­ness), and bound­ary set­ting (self-hatred).” For Gilman, the vex­ing chal­lenge faced by the schol­ar of Jew hatred is that, whether deemed nomadic or root­ed, the Jew­ish tar­get is always shift­ing and always dif­fer­ent, from place to place, from indi­vid­ual to indi­vid­ual, from epoch to epoch.” What most dis­tin­guish­es Gilman’s nuanced approach is his inher­ent chal­lenge to the com­mon and reac­tive view of those like Robert Wistrich who, in label­ing anti­semitism as the longest hatred,” insist on a sta­t­ic and eter­nal par­a­digm, some­how unlike all oth­er expres­sions of xeno­pho­bia. For Gilman, anti­semitisms are always sit­u­a­tion­al, inher­ent­ly incon­sis­tent, often con­tra­dic­to­ry.” A favorite word is wob­bly,” allud­ing to the ever-shift­ing, mal­leable mean­ings that have accom­pa­nied the Jews’ recep­tion by hos­tile indi­vid­u­als or col­lec­tives through­out time.

Whether address­ing the fraught role of hats or beards as key sig­ni­fiers in anti­se­mit­ic dis­course, the phys­iog­nom­ic imag­i­na­tion of Vic­to­ri­an Eng­land, or the nuances of con­tem­po­rary self-crit­i­cal Jew­ish dis­cours­es, Gilman’s insights are often sur­pris­ing and always illu­mi­nat­ing. Notwith­stand­ing the grim sub­ject mat­ter, this proves an enthralling intel­lec­tu­al adven­ture, often leav­ened by his sea­soned wit. Even those famil­iar with Gilman’s ear­li­er close exam­i­na­tions of the con­tra­dic­to­ry dis­cours­es of eugen­ics and mis­ce­gena­tion anx­i­eties, the fan­tasies of sci­en­tif­ic racism, and stereo­types of the Jew’s body,” will find much to appre­ci­ate, includ­ing his atten­tion to pop­u­lar cul­tur­al por­tray­als in comics, Hol­ly­wood films, and television. 

At the heart of Anti­semitisms is Gilman’s sus­tained focus on the con­test­ed, con­tra­dic­to­ry and flu­id” nature of both Jew­ish iden­ti­ties and the social and cul­tur­al fan­tasies of the anti­semite. Through­out, he inter­ro­gates a vast array of thorny issues— Holo­caust denial­ism, philosemitism,” cho­sen­ness,” charges of Jew­ish dual loy­al­ty,” and the con­tem­po­rary antizion­ism is anti­semitism” debates among them — always with his­tor­i­cal, polit­i­cal, and even lit­er­ary acu­men. At one point he address­es the cat­e­go­ry of so-called Jew­ish anti­semites,” a charge he him­self has faced. Gilman accom­plish­es all this with remark­able econ­o­my, as sug­gest­ed by the lacon­ic titles of his five chap­ters: Mak­ing Jews,” See­ing Jews,” Heal­ing Jews,” Wan­der­ing Jews,” and Unmak­ing Jews.” Anti­semitisms is gen­er­ous­ly illus­trat­ed with help­ful his­tor­i­cal images: satan­ic Jews of the medieval Chris­t­ian imag­i­na­tion, rab­bis of Vic­to­ri­an Lon­don, New York bankers in the late nine­teenth cen­tu­ry, and New Jews of ear­ly Zion­ist postcards. 

Like the best of Gilman’s vast cor­pus, Anti­semitisms is daz­zling­ly eru­dite yet as acces­si­ble to gen­er­al read­ers as it is to schol­ars. Per­haps what most dis­tin­guish­es Gilman’s approach from his pre­de­ces­sors on the groan­ing shelf on the sub­ject is his metic­u­lous­ly com­par­a­tive approach to the exam­i­na­tion of ide­olo­gies rep­re­sent­ed in this dis­course. He notes diverse ways that men­ac­ing dis­tinc­tions between self and Oth­er have accom­pa­nied many oth­er minori­ties across time and space. The Jews, as it turns out, are per­haps not quite so unique a case as many have con­clud­ed, even as dan­ger­ous fan­tasies and dehu­man­iz­ing tropes about us per­sist and inten­si­fy our grow­ing sense of unease in a time of ris­ing violence. 

Ranen Omer-Sher­man is the JHFE Endowed Chair in Juda­ic Stud­ies at the Uni­ver­si­ty of Louisville, author of sev­er­al books and edi­tor of Amos Oz: The Lega­cy of a Writer in Israel and Beyond.

Discussion Questions