Fic­tion

Glass Cen­tu­ry

  • Review
By – May 5, 2025

Glass Cen­tu­ry, Ross Barkan’s ambi­tious and wide-reach­ing sec­ond nov­el, starts with a comedic deceit: Saul Plotz, mar­ried father of two, arranges a fake wed­ding with his lover, Mona Glass, to trick and appease Mona’s old-world par­ents. It’s New York City in the ear­ly sev­en­ties, and the two lovers believe that, despite their fic­tion­al union, their arrange­ment — involv­ing Saul sneak­ing out to see Mona on a week­ly basis — will be okay, at least for now. Mona doesn’t want any more of Saul than she already has, and Saul isn’t will­ing to give up his fam­i­ly life in Long Island. They believe that things will even­tu­al­ly work them­selves out.

Fol­low­ing the wed­ding,” the nov­el depicts the course of Mona and Saul’s rela­tion­ship through the next fifty years, as they grow close and sep­a­rate, grow close and sep­a­rate. Like in Sex and the City, New York City acts as an extra pro­tag­o­nist in this romance: seem­ing­ly every large change and tragedy the city has expe­ri­enced — from the 77 black­out, to 9/11, and lat­er to the dev­as­ta­tion covid caused — is shown. As a pho­tog­ra­ph­er for the alter­na­tive tabloid, The Dai­ly Raider, and lat­er for the Post, Mona darts through the city with her cam­era, while Saul, life­long polit­i­cal bureau­crat, rubs elbows with may­ors, Rock­e­fellers, and, in an ear­ly scene, a young Don­ald Trump.

Although the focus on New York City is well-detailed and engross­ing, it does give the feel­ing that the plot and its char­ac­ters fol­low the city’s whims, rather than hav­ing the char­ac­ters lead the charge. This, in part, seems to be the point — how the city influ­ences the indi­vid­ual, how the char­ac­ters are always at the whim of greater forces out­side their con­trol — but it also some­times damp­ens the novel’s momen­tum. Sim­i­lar­ly, the novel’s scope some­times extends beyond what the nar­ra­tive can car­ry. Saul’s son by mar­riage, who is dis­il­lu­sioned with his fam­i­ly and soci­ety at large, receives a por­tion of the novel’s atten­tion, as does the son Saul and Mona have. Although they are both well-devel­oped char­ac­ters, the switch­es to their per­spec­tives, accom­pa­nied by large jumps in time between them, also dimin­ish the novel’s sense of direc­tion. Nev­er­the­less, the pieces ulti­mate­ly come togeth­er in a sat­is­fy­ing way.

One of the novel’s great­est strengths is its dia­logue. Barkan’s ear for speech is impec­ca­ble; pages-long con­ver­sa­tions float by, with a pal­pa­ble rhythm and a clear, con­sis­tent voice. In this, the char­ac­ters’ out-loud med­i­ta­tions on time, bat­tling a cos­mic sense of law­less­ness and chaos, and the chal­lenges of liv­ing a peo­pled, pur­pose-dri­ven life are com­pelling and convincing.

Glass Cen­tu­ry earns its place in the canon of the New York City nov­el, along with Don Delillo’s Under­world, Tom Wolfe’s The Bon­fire of the Van­i­ties, E. L. Doctorow’s Rag­time, and many others.

Ben­jamin Selesnick is a psy­chother­a­pist in New Jer­sey. His writ­ing has appeared in Bare­ly South ReviewLunch Tick­etTel Aviv Review of Books, and oth­er pub­li­ca­tions. He holds an MFA in fic­tion from Rut­gers University-Newark.

Discussion Questions