Kristall­nacht by Char­lotte Salomon, 1940 – 42

The paint­ing was one of the mas­ter­pieces of the col­lec­tion, but until that sum­mer I hadn’t spent much time look­ing at it. A for­est land­scape so dense it appears dark, as though the chil­dren in frothy pink dress­es and straw boaters deep in the canopy have been released to play after din­ner and have lin­gered long into the night. A frag­ment of blue sky in the painting’s upper left cor­ner — where the eye is led by the long lines of the tree trunks — tells us it’s more ordi­nary than that: it’s day­time, and the chil­dren and their chap­er­ones are safe, where they should be. 

This is La Ronde Enfan­tine, and it was paint­ed in 1862 by French artist Gus­tave Courbet (1819−1877). The muse­um where I worked as a cura­tor had just received dra­mat­ic new infor­ma­tion about the his­to­ry of the paint­ing: it had been loot­ed from the Parisian home of Jew­ish resis­tance hero Robert Bing and had entered the col­lec­tions of high-rank­ing Nazi offi­cials. I recall read­ing the report on the painting’s prove­nance with unease. The paint­ing was here, in the muse­um with me, but in my mind it was also there, in the pri­vate rooms of Göring and Ribben­trop. There was a strange, unwant­ed inti­ma­cy in look­ing where those men had looked, in tak­ing plea­sure in the same expres­sive brush­strokes and daubs of colour. Though, as I came to realise, we weren’t real­ly see­ing the same Courbet. My Courbet, who I sus­pect was also Bing’s Courbet, was a left­ist vision­ary inter­est­ed in the raw phys­i­cal­i­ty of nature; theirs was a painter who pro­duced hymns to rur­al life con­sis­tent with blood and soil ideology.

This resti­tu­tion case at The Fitzwilliam Muse­um in Cam­bridge was one of sev­er­al start­ing points for my debut nov­el, Venus, Van­ish­ing. I had rarely expe­ri­enced so intense­ly (and dis­turbing­ly) the col­li­sion of my iden­ti­ties as a Jew­ish woman and an art his­to­ri­an. Where the Courbet paint­ing had been, what it had wit­nessed, the lives it had touched, the con­ver­sa­tions it had sparked, were con­fronting. But it also sug­gest­ed a thought exper­i­ment about fas­cism and taste. Did artists labelled ​“degen­er­ate” by the regime because of their eth­nic­i­ty or reli­gion all make the same kind of art? Or were there artists who found them­selves absorbed by the regime’s ide­o­log­i­cal machine, mis­ap­pro­pri­at­ed in the same way as Courbet?

I might have answered this ques­tion through a straight­for­ward research project, comb­ing through the artists asso­ci­at­ed with the Degen­er­ate Art Exhi­bi­tion, which toured until 1941, and its Aryan sib­ling show, The Great Ger­man Art Exhi­bi­tion, which held its last edi­tion in Munich in 1942. But my instinc­tu­al curiosi­ties about the peri­od took me else­where. I became more inter­est­ed in Euro­pean Jew­ish artists who had their lives and careers destroyed by the Third Reich. There were tragedies I already knew to mourn. Char­lotte Salomon (1917−43) grew up in an assim­i­lat­ed Jew­ish fam­i­ly in Berlin. Life? Or The­atre? con­sists of 1,325 gouache draw­ings — an illus­trat­ed aut­ofic­tion­al account of her family’s his­to­ry of poor men­tal health — cre­at­ed with­in two years after she escaped Ger­many for the South of France. She was mur­dered in Auschwitz aged twen­ty-six. Salomon has right­ly received a huge amount of posthu­mous acclaim, and Life? Or The­atre? has toured the world — I was for­tu­nate to see the exhi­bi­tion when it came to Lon­don in 2019. 

I want­ed to write about Jew­ish life, about the ambi­tions, plea­sures, and love felt in defi­ance of the dehu­man­iza­tion inflict­ed upon Jew­ish com­mu­ni­ties by the Third Reich.

But there were many oth­er artists who cap­ti­vat­ed my atten­tion pre­cise­ly because they had fad­ed into obscu­ri­ty after being mur­dered, their work lost or destroyed. At the end of my nov­el, there is an (unex­haus­tive) list of these artists: I still find myself adding to that dev­as­tat­ing ledger now. As an art his­to­ri­an who had writ­ten a non-fic­tion book about over­looked British women artists, duti­ful­ly vis­it­ing archives and pub­lic col­lec­tions to pro­duce new research on their work, my first instinct was to apply my usu­al his­tor­i­cal method­olo­gies to these artists. But I quick­ly realised that there were too many artists and too lit­tle trace of their lives and work for this approach to suc­ceed. Per­haps I would have to invent a char­ac­ter — a com­pos­ite who drew on many of these slain artists’ lives — and a nar­ra­tive of cre­ativ­i­ty, resis­tance, and hope to hon­or these men and women. I was an avid read­er of fic­tion, but I hadn’t writ­ten any before. The ener­gy and moti­va­tion to attempt this daunt­ing task came from a place of grief. I want­ed to write about Jew­ish life, about the ambi­tions, plea­sures, and love felt in defi­ance of the dehu­man­iza­tion inflict­ed upon Jew­ish com­mu­ni­ties by the Third Reich. I don’t flat­ter myself that one nov­el can do much to mit­i­gate the Holocaust’s cat­a­stroph­ic loss­es of life and cul­ture. But there was some small con­so­la­tion in assem­bling my pro­tag­o­nist Han­nah from the rub­ble of all that fore­closed pos­si­bil­i­ty — and giv­ing her a dif­fer­ent ending.

For­tu­nate­ly, there were some Jew­ish artists who some­how man­aged to sur­vive, either through flee­ing Europe at an oppor­tune moment or going into hid­ing. One who stuck with me from the begin­ning of my research was Lotte Laser­stein (1898−1993), who left Ger­many for Swe­den in 1937, and lat­er for Cal­i­for­nia. She was one of the only women artists asso­ci­at­ed with the New Objec­tiv­i­ty move­ment, and her paint­ings are high­ly accom­plished and star­tling­ly inti­mate insights into every­day life in the final years of the Weimar Repub­lic. In her 1929 self-por­trait, I and my Mod­el, Laser­stein meets the spectator’s gaze with an ambigu­ous expres­sion that in some moods I’ve read as defi­ance, in oth­ers as trep­i­da­tion. The polit­i­cal sit­u­a­tion was dete­ri­o­rat­ing, but she can’t know what’s com­ing. I felt Laserstein’s look as an invi­ta­tion, just as I had felt the cho­rus of mur­dered Jew­ish artists as a ral­ly­ing cry, and all the while the awful jour­ney tak­en by La Ronde Enfan­tine con­tin­ued to jos­tle at the edges of my mind. Venus, Van­ish­ing was the medi­um I arrived at for con­nect­ing these his­to­ries, art­works, lives, and ideas.

Adapt­ed from the author’s his­tor­i­cal note in Venus, Van­ish­ing (Hen­ry Holt and Co., 2026).

Rebec­ca Bir­rell is an art his­to­ri­an and a Bye-Fel­low in the His­to­ry of Art at Mur­ray Edwards Col­lege, Uni­ver­si­ty of Cam­bridge. She was for­mer­ly the cura­tor of nine­teenth and twen­ti­eth cen­tu­ry paint­ings and draw­ings at the Fitzwilliam Muse­um and has occu­pied cura­to­r­i­al posi­tions at the Jew­ish Muse­um Lon­don, the Depart­ment of Prints and Draw­ing at the British Muse­um, and at the Charleston Trust. She stud­ied Eng­lish lit­er­a­ture at Uni­ver­si­ty Col­lege Lon­don, fol­lowed by a mas­ter’s in women’s stud­ies at the Uni­ver­si­ty of Oxford and a PhD from the Edin­burgh Col­lege of Art. Venus, Van­ish­ing is her debut novel.